View source for Talk:Main Page

Note: I sporked a lot of the mainpage code from my friends [http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/Main_Page here] 

== Visitors ==

Statistics now at [[Teflpedia:Statistics]]

==Google rank==
As of late June 2009 our main page had a google rank of 4.--[[User:Bob M|Bob M]] 09:15, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

== Reset Password? John Musca ==

Hello,
Need help resetting my password.
Thank you,

:(Weird external ref removed.)
:Hello John.  Before we can reset your password you have to have an account. Do you have an account?--[[User:Bob M|Bob M]] 20:17, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

== Language families ==

A thought occurs to me: are there different teaching methods for studnts from different language families? It strikes me that teaching English to (eg) German speakers would be a vastly different experience to teaching speakers of Chinese, because the languages are constructed in entirely different ways. Is this a problem in TEFL, and if so, is it worth including it in TEFLpedia? [[User:Totnesmartin|Totnesmartin]] 14:13, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
:The simple answer is yes.  The closer the language is to English then the less the student has to learn, though [[false friend]]s can be a problem. In Spanish for example there are a vast number of words which are similar between the two languages.  While the grammar different, it is not totally alien like, for instance, Basque.  Also European languages already have a very similar alphabet which is a big help.  Furthermore Asian languages are usually tonal which, as you imply, makes learning any European language more difficult for them.
:One might also consider how these foreign languages are taught.  My impression is that there is more investigation (and hence more theories about) English teaching than other languages simply because English is the most taught language in the world.
:My experience of other language learning is that there is a lot more grammar taught up front than there is in English. English gave up on the [[Grammar Translation Method]] as a prime teaching tool some time ago and turned to other more communicative systems.
:However, it may be that other languages can only be taught after a fair bit of theory has been assimilated.  I remember having conversation classes with real total beginners in English (in fact a pretty rare breed these days) but if you give them "to be" and some prepositions and nouns you can say "The pen is on the table", "The pencil is next to the phone."  A colleague of mine was teaching Basque in the room next door, also to total beginners and asked me what the hell I did with them.  When I explained she told me I was very lucky as in Basque any preposition is incorporated into the noun to which it refers following some complicated rules and verb conjugations run to several pages.
:Or take the phrase.  "The red cow ran." I can change the number and sex of the subject.  Cows, cow, bull bulls and that's all I need to change to make a new phrase.  "The red bulls ran".  In Spanish every single word would need to be changed for each of the four possible subjects.  (Although I must admit that the example is a little contrived.)
:I see I rather rambled off you point a bit though.  :-( --[[User:Bob M|Bob M]] 14:46, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
::Not much more I can add to that, but I will. Like Bob, I could go on for hours :)  One key consideration is that if the teacher is fully aware of the linguistic difficulties of the students' mother tongue regarding learning another language - be they grammar-related or pronunciation, etc. teaching will obviously be more effective. This is why I insist that, say, a Spaniard with training as an English-language teacher is usually a far more effective teacher to Spaniards than a native English speaker with little or no training in language teaching. This leads on to other discussions regarding use of [[L1]] in the classroom, and so on.
::Another important aspect is that teaching a foreign language requires far more than being "merely" a native speaker. One typical ploy here in Spain - and someone will probably slash my car tyres on reading this - is for language schools to advertise things like "We only employ native English teachers with university degrees" - now that you have been forewarned, it's easy to spot how this is deliberately misleading. But students are led to believe that a native speaker is by definition what they need.
::Answering your last question, as to whether it's worth including in teflpedia, the answer is... yes and no. Yes, it's worth including on spaces such as the [[Teflpedia:Teachers' room]] as a constructive exchange of opinions and experiences, but no, I don't think we can make an actual article page out of it, not least 'cos it would be pure POV and read like an essay. 
::Looking back over what I've just written, maybe that wouldn't be a bad idea. In fact, maybe teflpedia could offer a formal space for teachers - and students - to write about their language-learning experiences. It would have to be moderated by admins to ensure that nothing libellous were posted and it could include keywords to ease indexing. I'm outta here! --[[User:Technopat|Technopat]] 15:57, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
:::Actually, that is sort of what our somewhat virgin "Essay space" is for.  It's for people to present a non-neutral point of view about some topic associated with language learning and then for it to be debated on the appropriate talk page.--[[User:Bob M|Bob M]] 17:28, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
::::Greetings Bob M - I had no idea - or maybe I had forgotten - that there was an essay space. I've just seen it now at the bottome of the Main page, so I must have read it when I first popped in. Maybe there could be a link on the navigation bar to the left so that it could present in people's minds. Is it moderated? Re. the keywords in my edit above, I'd forgotten that the wikilinks serve that function perfectly. Silly bunt! Cheers!--[[User:81.32.110.111|81.32.110.111]] 08:22, 17 September 2009 (UTC) Forgot to login (I did click the signature icon, though!) - sorry!--[[User:Technopat|Technopat]] 08:24, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
:::::I guess it would be moderated at the [[Teflpedia:User page | same level as user pages]].  Nothing slanderous (which I'm just going to add), obscene, racist or libellous.  Is that what you were asking?  I don't want to fill up the nav bar with too much stuff, also it's a namespace so you can't really link to it (I think).  Every essay would have the category essay though and I could link to that. But it's empty at the moment so I'm not sure that we're ready for it yet.  But if it gets some action I'll put it up.  Indeed, if we get some interesting or challenging essays we could hi-light them on the mainpage in the featured article spot. --[[User:Bob M|Bob M]] 08:52, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
::::::I've clarified what would be unacceptable in our [[Teflpedia:Community Standards]].  Best to be pro-active.--[[User:Bob M|Bob M]] 09:00, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

== introduction ==

Hi,


thanks for the great quality of your forum, every  time i come here, i'm amazed.
i read your posts regularly and i finaly decided to subscribe.

:Thank you, I removed  your link which didn't seem relevant.--[[User:Bob M|Bob M]] 09:16, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

==Spam attack==

Thanks to those who helped out washing back the recent spam wave. As far as I can tell it came from spammers "hosted-by.altushost.com".  I ''think'' that I've prevented access so that things should calm down.  We've had waves like this before but not usually so persistent.--[[User:Bob M|Bob M]] 10:28, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
:Nope still getting through.  Try something else.--[[User:Bob M|Bob M]] 11:22, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
::Think I've got him with a server-side block now.  Problem is that they have a large range of their own IPs and on top of that they actually edit under proxies.--[[User:Bob M|Bob M]] 12:06, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
:::Oh well. In the meantime, the rest of us can surely keep a lookout, too. [[User:Gooniepunk2005|Gooniepunk2005]] 19:33, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
::::OK.  :-)  Interestedly, these waves usually come through around the start of the month - but not every month. I remember I spent quite some time a couple of months ago chasing down and blocking IPs associated with altushost.  Maybe they change something periodically at the start of the month which lets them get through again.  They also eat up a pile of bandwith. Of the 180 Mb used so far this month by my 947 visitors, 60 Mb was used by that one site.--[[User:Bob M|Bob M]] 20:43, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
::::::Wow. That is a pain in the rear, isn't it? [[User:Gooniepunk2005|Gooniepunk2005]] 21:38, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
:::::::Well, I've had worse.  In Feb the same group got through almost 300 Mb before I plugged the leak.  And in May about 200. But as long as my total monthly is below 2 Gig it's not a problem. It's an interesting intellectual exercise spotting them and blocking them. Well it is if you've got the time to spend on it - if you're in a hurry it's a pain.  But I'm getting better at it anyway.
:::::::What I'm not sure is why they keep hitting. It's loads of pageviews.  Presumably they are checking for something but I'm not sure what.  Thinking about it, it's possible that they are hitting locked pages over and over again to see if the protection has expired.  When the spirit moves me I may look at the logs to see if I can work it out.  But rangeblocking them keeps them out anyway.--[[User:Bob M|Bob M]] 21:53, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
Lot's more spam coming in. I would be able to be a bit more proactive, but I'm away from my main PC at the moment.--[[User:Bob M|Bob M]] 16:20, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

== We're back ==

Sorry for the downtime.  The spammers blew us out of the water for a while.--[[User:Bob M|Bob M]] 10:26, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

== Signup question ==

I like the way I got asked a simple question when signing up. RW gets a ton of spambots nowadays, how do we get the software changed? [[User:Sophie|<span style="color:#008080">'''Sophie'''</span>]][[User_talk:Sophie|<span style="color#FF9933"><sup>''Wilder''</sup></span>]] 06:53, 25 March 2012 (CDT)
:Drop a note on [[User:Roger | this guy's]]  page.  He's really good at spam restriction.  It's down to zero now which is quite some achievement given the way that many wikis are suffering at the moment.  We had to kill IP editing unfortunately, but the rest works great.--[[User:Bob M|Bob M]] 16:16, 25 March 2012 (CDT)

== Main Page markup ==
(See '''[[Main Page Redo]],''' view its markup and let me know what you think!)

I propose to clean up the [[Main Page]] markup which currently is so complex it is difficult to work with. I will aim, initially, to recreate the current look (boxed main item headings with colored backgrounds) and function (transcluding various item texts from individually editable plain wiki markup pages) while reducing the clutter of style markup by off loading that to [[MediaWiki:Common.css]]. This will give us a Main Page with look and feel you can readily work on and improve over time, while maintaining the current strategy of having separate pages hold the actual texts of the page for easy editing. --[[User:Roger|Roger]] 16:33, 1 July 2012 (CDT)

Each items heading title will be editable in the first heading on its text page, thus editable without need to touch the Main Page itself. --[[User:Roger|Roger]] 16:33, 1 July 2012 (CDT)

I will move the Main Page texts to subpages of Main Page. This is logical and they can easily be found with [http://teflpedia.com/index.php?title=Special%3APrefixIndex&prefix=Main+Page&namespace=0 '''list of pages with prefix "Main Page"''']):
* [[Main Page]]
* [[Main Page/About]]
* [[Main Page/Feature]]
* [[Main Page/Me]]
* [[Main Page/Copyright]]
* [[Main Page/Wiki]]
* [[Main Page/Edit]] 
* [[Main Page/Explore]] 
* [[Main Page/Structure]] 
--[[User:Roger|Roger]] 16:33, 1 July 2012 (CDT)

Bob, once Main Page is easily editable again, you could consider trimming it's content a little to avoid message dilution. So... I'll park the redo at '''[[Main Page Redo]]''' for now -- let me know what you think and if I may move it to Main Page proper. Cheers! --[[User:Roger|Roger]] 16:33, 1 July 2012 (CDT)