User talk:Nx
Hi Nx. I'm afraid that you'll be initially constrained by Trent's vandal break. :-( --Bob M 15:33, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for your help on the templates. Much appreciated.--Bob M 16:47, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
- You're welcome. Nx 16:56, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Proxima
I think slowly removing stuff so that she doesn't notice is the best route. We have made a small amount of progress, like fixing the dates. Phantom Hoover 08:19, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
- No. Someone will listen. We cannot let her remain there. Nx 08:31, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
- But until someone turns up? Anyway, she's reprotected the page. Oh, do you know who Epsilon is? Phantom Hoover 08:40, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
- Oooh, a block. But I wasn't encouraging the vandal, merely giving them formatting tips! Phantom Hoover 09:03, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
- But until someone turns up? Anyway, she's reprotected the page. Oh, do you know who Epsilon is? Phantom Hoover 08:40, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Wikiindex
You've been unblocked. Phantom Hoover 07:29, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
- Woo hoo! Human 07:52, 26 August 2009 (UTC) - Wait, what about you, oh magical vacuum cleaner? Human 07:53, 26 August 2009 (UTC) Yes, you too, apparently. Human 07:54, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
OK, I don't know how this happened, but I got edit buttons at the RW article, so I cleaned it up. But it was never unprotected, and I sure as hell was not sysopped. So, guys'n'gals, please go make sure what I wrote is accurate and clear and appropriate? Kthxbai :) Human 08:17, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
- Ah, I get it. PC's protection expired is all... Human 08:18, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
[edit] The Great Exodus
I thought that was going to RationalWikiWiki? Pi 03:15, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
- Me too. Why? Nx 05:50, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
- We wrote it for ourselves as well. RWW is such a backwater nothing ever gets the mob treatment (ie, anyone noticing, lots of editing). Human 05:58, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
- I'd say put in both places. Then edit it to be more
sarcasticfunny in RWW and more serious in RW.--Bob M 06:12, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
- I'd say put in both places. Then edit it to be more
- We wrote it for ourselves as well. RWW is such a backwater nothing ever gets the mob treatment (ie, anyone noticing, lots of editing). Human 05:58, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Technical questions
- WIGO CP will need to be edited to have "real" voting added; will we keep the joke "vote" template in the wigos themselves?.
- I will do that and I'll keep the fake votes in a comment at least, so we don't lose them. We can later decide what we want to do with them. Nx 06:01, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
- Cool. I think we should leave them in the WIGO itself. They are a part of our history, after all, and most are pretty funny. No need to use the "vote" template for them, though. Perhaps just put them in quotes? Human 06:40, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
- We could add something like this in from of the wigo text: ([[The Great Exodus|fake vote]]:pi/2) Nx 06:44, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
- Cool. I think we should leave them in the WIGO itself. They are a part of our history, after all, and most are pretty funny. No need to use the "vote" template for them, though. Perhaps just put them in quotes? Human 06:40, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
- I will do that and I'll keep the fake votes in a comment at least, so we don't lose them. We can later decide what we want to do with them. Nx 06:01, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
- If all edits are copied over, we're gonna get some weird archive problems.